Reading an MS report that only gives you a single number
Worth separating two things that post #33 runs together.
Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.
post #68 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Electrospray ionisation produces multiply charged ions. For a 4 kDa peptide you expect mostly 2+, 3+, and 4+ charge states. Reading an electrospray spectrum means recognizing the envelope, not looking for one peak.
post #73 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Calibration matters: a high-resolution instrument out of calibration can report mass with ppm error large enough to be uninformative. Check when the instrument was last calibrated before trusting the reported accuracy.
Quantitation by MS: most quantitation is done by LC-UV detection at 214 nm, not by MS, because extinction coefficients are better known. MS can quantify if an internal standard is used but that requires preparation.
Picking up post #99: that is the part I would want checked first.
Resolution: "high resolution" commonly means <5 ppm across the mass range. Unit-resolution instruments achieve ±1 Da at best and cannot distinguish two species differing by less than 1 Da in total mass.
post #110 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Tandem mass spectrometry: MS/MS fragments the molecular ion and uses fragment masses to confirm identity and detect modifications. A simple identity confirmation by LC-MS does not address post-translational modifications or impurities with the same or very close mass.
Read the full topic (114 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- MS/MS sequence confirmation: what it costs and when it is worth it — what changed sinceAnalytics › Mass spectrometry · 39 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Coming back to: Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, tabulated
Oxidation and deamidation mass shifts, tabulated — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. retatrutide has a…
|
+34 | 38 | 4.8k | 10mo |
|
Coming back to: Deconvolution of a multiply charged envelope
On the subject in the title: Deconvolution of a multiply charged envelope Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. tirzepatide has a…
|
2 | 12k | 22mo | |
|
Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone
Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
|
+121 | 129 | 25k | 17mo |
|
What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not
What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
|
+56 | 60 | 5.2k | 9mo |
|
Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone — the long version
On the subject in the title: Distinguishing a deletion sequence by mass alone — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
+38 | 44 | 60k | 11mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags counter-ion content, mass error (ppm), charge states
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the Mass spectrometry category
LC-MS and high-resolution MS, charge states, mass accuracy in ppm, and what identity confirmation does and does not establish. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it,…
|
+5 | 9 | 19k | 6h |
|
Residual solvents and scavengers: what is looked for
On the subject in the title: Residual solvents and scavengers: what is looked for Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise…
|
+19 | 23 | 39k | 14mo |
|
Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely
Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
|
+61 | 69 | 2.9k | 6mo |
|
Follow-up: Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences
On the subject in the title: Trifluoroacetate content and its consequences Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
|
+12 | 16 | 5.7k | 21mo |
|
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
|
2 | 15k | 18mo |