Residual solvents and scavengers: what is looked for — what changed since
Picking up post #3: that is the part I would want checked first.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
I read post #7 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Dimer and higher-order multimers: two or more peptide molecules bonded together. They appear at double the mass and higher. They may or may not separate from the monomer on HPLC depending on the method.
I read post #10 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Off-target structures: if the sequence synthesis goes wrong, a completely different amino acid can be incorporated. The resulting off-target peptide is a structural isomer with the same mass but a different sequence. No chromatographic purity method detects this without a reference standard.
post #27 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Off-target structures: if the sequence synthesis goes wrong, a completely different amino acid can be incorporated. The resulting off-target peptide is a structural isomer with the same mass but a different sequence. No chromatographic purity method detects this without a reference standard.
Picking up post #30: that is the part I would want checked first.
Residual solvents: traces of solvents used in purification. These are usually tested by gas chromatography, not by HPLC. A specification for residual solvents should be stated separately from the purity.
Read the full topic (42 posts)
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Deletion sequences: expected mass shifts by residue — the long version
On the subject in the title: Deletion sequences: expected mass shifts by residue — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
|
+21 | 25 | 6.9k | 10h |
|
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity — what changed since
On the subject in the title: Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have…
|
+78 | 91 | 1k | 10h |
|
Coming back to: Oxidation pathways for methionine and tryptophan
Oxidation pathways for methionine and tryptophan Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
|
+1 | 5 | 36k | 15mo |
|
Impurity thresholds: where the common numbers come from
Impurity thresholds: where the common numbers come from — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a certificate in…
|
+11 | 15 | 825 | 2d |
|
Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely
Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
|
+61 | 69 | 2.9k | 6mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags forced degradation, water content, data table
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gradient steepness and apparent purity: a worked comparison — the long version
Gradient steepness and apparent purity: a worked comparison — the long version — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I…
|
2 | 32k | 1d | |
|
[2026 update] Waist circumference technique and its repeatability
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Waist circumference technique and its repeatability Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without…
|
+23 | 27 | 5.9k | 21h |
|
[2026 update] Why 99.2% and 97.8% on the same lot can both be correct
Why 99.2% and 97.8% on the same lot can both be correct — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I would like to understand what this number means before I…
|
+1 | 5 | 719 | 2d |
|
What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not
What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
|
+56 | 60 | 5.2k | 9mo |
|
An ABAB design with a data table and honest limitations — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: An ABAB design with a data table and honest limitations — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it before…
|
+106 | 118 | 25k | 4mo |