The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Second pass at: Reading a combination trial: attributing effect to components

This is a generated summary. It shows the 6 most-liked posts from a topic of 44, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
EL
e.lokkenTL2 Moderator23 Mar 2025#1

Second pass at: Reading a combination trial: attributing effect to components — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable.

I have seen SURMOUNT-2 (Lancet, 2023) cited in support of a claim I do not think it supports, twice this month, so I would like to work through what it actually shows.

My reading is that the trial is sound for its own question and is being stretched to answer a different one. I might be wrong about that, which is why this is a topic rather than a correction.

What I would like from this discussion: someone who disagrees with me to say why, with the section of the paper they are relying on.

24 likes 16mo
HF
h.friskTL2 Moderator7 May 2025#13

post #12 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Reading the phase 2 paper: it establishes tolerability and efficacy in a selected population on a defined dose escalation. It does not establish the lowest effective dose or the durability over years.

26 likes 15mo
KD
k.dahlbergTL2 Moderator28 May 2025#21
n.boateng, post #11: I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological. The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient. Go to post

The CagriSema phase 2 paper: a fixed combination of the two components in one weekly injection. The trade-off of a fixed combination is that you cannot titrate the components independently and you cannot attribute effect to one component from a combination trial.

28 likes in reply to #11 14mo
BD
b.demirTL2 Moderator8 Jun 2025#25
n.boateng, post #11: I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological. The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient. Go to post

Amylin signalling is distinct from GLP-1 signalling. Amylin slows gastric emptying and promotes satiety through a different receptor and different neural pathways. The hypothesis behind combination is two complementary satiety mechanisms with one injection.

21 likes in reply to #11 14mo
AR
ambient_reviewTL3Regular6 Jul 2025 · edited#37

Historical amylin analogues: pramlintide was the only long-acting amylin analogue licensed for some time and its poor adherence was a known limitation. A weekly formulation addresses that practical barrier.

24 likes 13mo
RJ
r.jhannsdttirTL3Regular19 Jul 2025#43

Reading the phase 2 paper: it establishes tolerability and efficacy in a selected population on a defined dose escalation. It does not establish the lowest effective dose or the durability over years.

26 likes 12mo

Read the full topic (44 posts)

Promoted into the documentation commons. The content of this topic is maintained at Cagrilintide — reference, with named maintainers and a review date. The promotion was discussed in doc review. Corrections are best raised against the document, which is the version that gets kept current.

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Historical amylin analogues and what happened to them
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Historical amylin analogues and what happened to them Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in support of a…
OFEIDVSGAR+29 36 31k 1d
The CagriSema phase 2 paper and what a fixed combination buys
Posting this under the heading it deserves: The CagriSema phase 2 paper and what a fixed combination buys Everything below is what sits behind that. I have seen SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in…
DSTDEFRECB+88 93 29k 11mo
Follow-up: Is "synergy" the right word for the combination data?
Is "synergy" the right word for the combination data? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a…
CLBKSS 2 41k 14mo
Follow-up: What is genuinely unknown about long-term amylin agonism
What is genuinely unknown about long-term amylin agonism I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I have seen SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support…
NKSADM 2 25k 11mo
[2026 update] Amylin and gastric emptying: overlapping mechanisms with incretins
Amylin and gastric emptying: overlapping mechanisms with incretins — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024). Please read it before…
BTRHAAMYE+21 25 44k 5mo

Related topics — sharing the tags cagrilintide, randomised trial, amylin analogues

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Why fasting instructions for oral semaglutide are not optional advice — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why fasting instructions for oral semaglutide are not optional advice — does this still hold? Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019).…
MVEBATJSI+98 106 3.1k 10mo
Sample size calculations, read backwards from the published number
Sample size calculations, read backwards from the published number Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016). Please…
IARMA 2 8.1k 6mo
[2026 update] Tirzepatide in obstructive sleep apnoea: reading SURMOUNT-OSA
Tirzepatide in obstructive sleep apnoea: reading SURMOUNT-OSA — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do not think…
TTSIKR 2 58k 11mo
A structured critique template this community uses — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: A structured critique template this community uses — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023). Please read it before…
PRFLKBACAW+47 51 16k 15h
Second pass at: Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind
Second pass at: Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021). Please…
JSJISTGBM+39 44 632 14mo