The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Evidence · subcategory

Study critique

Structured criticism of a specific published study. Criticise the method, not the author.

24 topics1,050 posts7 solved Moderators: bench_notes About this category

24 topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Measurement error in a self-reported exposure
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Measurement error in a self-reported exposure Everything below is what sits behind that. The question about measurement error that I actually want answered is the…
LHCKSVCW+117 129 45k 5mo
A well-designed study with a badly written abstract
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A well-designed study with a badly written abstract Everything below is what sits behind that. Reading back through what has been written here about well-designed…
RCMICBMRPN+117 128 7.2k 14mo
Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome — a second dataset
Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome — a second dataset Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Posting a small dataset on Reverse causation. It…
MRAKANKBVK+112 131 1.5k 10mo
[2026 update] Confounding by indication, explained with a concrete example
Confounding by indication, explained with a concrete example Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a…
DMELCVHNIG+103 116 22k 5mo
Criticising the method without criticising the authors
Criticising the method without criticising the authors Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I was wrong about criticising the method without criticising in a…
KBZOKOJMTV+55 61 60k 15mo
A claim built entirely on a subgroup analysis
A claim built entirely on a subgroup analysis Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled view on claim built, and I…
ASKHMIASNP+71 80 1.1k 14mo
Coming back to: A structured critique template this community uses
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A structured critique template this community uses Everything below is what sits behind that. Reading back through what has been written here about structured…
SOFAKHASMY+63 69 17k 18h
Criticising the method without criticising the authors — one year on
On the subject in the title: Criticising the method without criticising the authors — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. A methods question rather than a substantive one, about Criticising…
KOSKJNAKSC+16 20 61k 11mo
A structured critique template this community uses — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: A structured critique template this community uses — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on structured critique template. It is mine,…
PRFLKBACAW+47 51 16k 15h
Coming back to: Measurement error in a self-reported exposure
Measurement error in a self-reported exposure — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Reading back through what has been written here about Measurement error, three questions…
LARNOAKACD+23 27 49k 3mo
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Asking about immortal time bias directly, because I have read four threads on it and each…
MACDSOIDNN+29 34 28k 11mo
A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author Everything below is what sits behind that. Critique, and specifically the version of it that the…
MSASFIONS+34 38 20k 17h
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — one year on
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — one year on Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled view on…
VMDMMGRPT+41 46 3.7k 22h
Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate
Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working notes on selection rather than a conclusion. I would rather post the…
SSLMAA 2 55k 7mo
Confounding by indication, explained with a concrete example
On the subject in the title: Confounding by indication, explained with a concrete example Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) with SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med ,…
TVARBDSBCD+21 25 21k 11mo
Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate — a second dataset
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Selection into a registry and what it does to the estimate — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. Posting a small dataset on Selection. It is…
PBINVFPES+28 32 1.3k 1d
A well-designed study with a badly written abstract — does this still hold?
A well-designed study with a badly written abstract — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Asking about well-designed study on behalf…
ENCEKA 2 28k 20mo
Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome
On the subject in the title: Reverse causation in a cohort study of weight and outcome Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on reverse causation. It is mine, it is uncontrolled, and…
LVDRIEDDN+10 14 11k 7mo
A structured critique template this community uses
A structured critique template this community uses — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Structured critique template — I have the observation and I do not trust my…
ZOCEK 2 18k 1d
Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect — one year on
Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I was wrong about Critiquing an observational claim in a thread last…
FELDKRAWDO+5 9 3.2k 8mo
Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Critiquing an observational claim about a class effect Everything below is what sits behind that. I was wrong about critiquing an observational claim in a thread…
VRRIJV 2 6.9k 14mo
Coming back to: A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author
A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Reading back through what has been written here about critique, three…
IAQLJB 2 1.3k 14mo
A claim built entirely on a subgroup analysis — what changed since
On the subject in the title: A claim built entirely on a subgroup analysis — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. What changes if the standard account of claim built is wrong? I ask…
AWZCQZ 2 2k 18mo
About the Study critique category
Structured criticism of a specific published study. Criticise the method, not the author. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…
BNJNDEHF 4 114 16mo