Outcomes · Progress reports · continued

A plateau that disappeared when I changed how I measured posts 31–32

Outcomes › Progress reports DXA long read effect size

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.

b.correiaTL2 Moderator10 Apr 2026#31

Two things before anyone answers the substance.

First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.

6 likes 4mo

buffer_shiftTL1Member13 Apr 2026#32

Plateaus and resets: if weight loss stalls and then resumes, that is ordinary. It is not evidence that the medication stopped working. It is not evidence that it is still working either. It is a data point in a longer record.

1 like 3mo

This topic was referenced in

A 40-week log with the measurement method stated — what changed sinceOutcomes › Progress reports · 13 replies
Coming back to: An 18-month record including the parts that went badlyOutcomes › Progress reports · 89 replies

Suggested topics

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead Outcomes › Progress reports data table DXA effect size long read Seven-day rolling means and why weekly readings mislead Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost…	+109	125	42k	10h
Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here Outcomes › Progress reports data table DXA effect size Closed Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number…	+21	29	62k	10mo
What I would record differently if I started again Outcomes › Progress reports DXA long read data table effect size Closed Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What I would record differently if I started again Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost nobody writes about. I have…		2	12k	5mo
An 18-month record including the parts that went badly Outcomes › Progress reports data table long read effect size DXA An 18-month record including the parts that went badly — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method is…	+77	81	17k	12h
[2026 update] Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here Outcomes › Progress reports DXA long read data table Pinned Closed On the subject in the title: Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here Working notes rather than a conclusion. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method is…		2	11k	8mo

Related topics — sharing the tags DXA, long read, effect size

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
The most common factual error about semaglutide on the internet — what changed since Compounds › Semaglutide effect size randomised trial SELECT trial type 2 diabetes The most common factual error about semaglutide on the internet — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with STEP 1 ( N…	+42	46	1.7k	5mo
Training through a dose escalation week Nutrition & Training › Resistance training lean mass loss DXA fatigue Training through a dose escalation week — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost nobody writes about. I have…		4	42k	20mo
What pooling buys you and what it destroys Evidence › Meta-analyses publication bias risk of bias meta-analysis heterogeneity Solved The question in the title: What pooling buys you and what it destroys I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with LEADER ( N Engl J Med ,…	+74	83	6.6k	8mo
Lean mass preservation: what the evidence supports Outcomes › Body composition lean mass loss bioimpedance DXA Lean mass preservation: what the evidence supports Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost nobody…	+23	27	347	14mo
[2026 update] Conference abstracts as evidence: the weakest common citation Evidence › Preprints needs a source effect size preprint risk of bias Closed Conference abstracts as evidence: the weakest common citation — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) with SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024) and finding…		2	48k	7mo