The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Analytics · Home & field testing

What a simple presence test is genuinely useful for

Solved
Solved by l.vermeulen in post #3
Why third-party testing is stronger: a home test run by the person who made the compound is a self-selected result. The test run by a neutral third party removes obvious sources of bias.

Jump to the accepted answer →

IB
i.brobergTL2 Moderator5 Jun 2026#1

What a simple presence test is genuinely useful for — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked.

Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.

semaglutide has a monoisotopic mass close to 4113.6 Da. On an electrospray instrument I would expect to see the multiply charged series rather than the intact singly charged ion, so for the doubly charged species I calculate (4113.6 + 2 x 1.00728) / 2, and for the triply charged the analogous expression.

The observed values in the report sit within a few ppm of those. My question is what that actually establishes, because I have seen people treat a mass match as a purity result and I do not think it is one.

0 likes 2mo
N
NardoneTL2Member5 Jul 2026#2

Sample handling matters: if a sample is contaminated or degraded before testing, the test gives you the result for the degraded sample, not for fresh material. That is not a failure of the test; it is the test working correctly.

3 likes 23d
LV
l.vermeulenTL2 Moderator Solution27 Jul 2026#3
i.broberg, post #1: What a simple presence test is genuinely useful for — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. semaglutide has a monoisotopic mass close to 4113.6 Da. On an electrospray instrument I would expect to see the multiply charged… Go to post

Why third-party testing is stronger: a home test run by the person who made the compound is a self-selected result. The test run by a neutral third party removes obvious sources of bias.

16 likes in reply to #1 1d

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Cost versus information: making the trade-off explicitly
Cost versus information: making the trade-off explicitly Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
TVSSDDVBS+2 6 12k 11h
A comparison of home results against a laboratory result on the same vial
Posting this under the heading it deserves: A comparison of home results against a laboratory result on the same vial Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I…
AISSJMKOSB+61 65 35k 8mo
A comparison of home results against a laboratory result on the same vial — does this still hold?
A comparison of home results against a laboratory result on the same vial — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Working through the…
BKZSCPFYLP+2 6 15k 11h
What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet — what changed since
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet — what changed since Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
JCPSIBKTL+101 111 1.9k 21h
Reading a home test result without over-claiming — what changed since
On the subject in the title: Reading a home test result without over-claiming — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
KDPMHV 2 12k 6mo

Related topics — sharing the tags documentation quality, ELISA, third-party testing

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
About the COA interpretation category
What a certificate of analysis commits its issuer to, which fields matter, and how to spot one that says almost nothing. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and…
JMHSHVSKLF+8 12 8.5k 2mo
Revisiting: Spike-and-recover accuracy for a peptide assay
Revisiting: Spike-and-recover accuracy for a peptide assay — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it anywhere.…
SCVKEC 2 6.8k 21h
Repeatability versus intermediate precision
Repeatability versus intermediate precision — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
LSKAILWNO+119 134 34k 13mo
Splitting a vial for two laboratories: how to do it without ruining both
Splitting a vial for two laboratories: how to do it without ruining both — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better…
GEKAKFEMO+64 70 4.4k 13mo
What a simple presence test is genuinely useful for — does this still hold?
What a simple presence test is genuinely useful for — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I would like to understand what this…
HFRLRA 2 22k 16mo