Aggregates: multiples of the monomer mass. May not elute at all under a standard reversed-phase method. A species that does not come off the column does not appear in the area percentage.
A rising related-substance total over six months: degradation or method drift?
I read post #22 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Dimer and higher-order multimers: two or more peptide molecules bonded together. They appear at double the mass and higher. They may or may not separate from the monomer on HPLC depending on the method.
Coming back to post #26, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Truncation products: fragments from incomplete synthesis or from degradation. They elute quite differently from the intact peptide because they are much smaller and have different hydrophobicity. They are usually well separated.
Picking up post #29: that is the part I would want checked first.
Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.
This follows post #33 rather than contradicting it.
Related substances: compounds chemically related to the target peptide but not the target peptide itself. The standard method separates them and reports them as area percent. How related they can be before they exceed specification is a regulatory question.
Incomplete deprotection: mass higher by the protecting group mass. Usually markedly later eluting. A synthesis artifact from incomplete removal of protecting groups.
Read the full topic (43 posts)
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
2 | 22k | 4mo | |
|
Oxidation pathways for methionine and tryptophan
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Oxidation pathways for methionine and tryptophan Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
|
+58 | 63 | 1k | 19mo |
|
Impurity thresholds: where the common numbers come from
Impurity thresholds: where the common numbers come from — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a certificate in…
|
+11 | 15 | 825 | 2d |
|
Follow-up: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting the method first, because I know what the first…
|
+15 | 19 | 671 | 17mo |
|
[2026 update] A rising related-substance total over six months: degradation or method drift?
The question in the title: A rising related-substance total over six months: degradation or method drift? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Posting the method first, because…
|
+71 | 78 | 34k | 5mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags data table, endotoxin testing, HPLC
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Circumference measurements as a poor man's composition estimate
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Circumference measurements as a poor man's composition estimate Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a…
|
+96 | 112 | 14k | 23mo |
|
Contributing data without breaching anyone's privacy
Contributing data without breaching anyone's privacy Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
+65 | 71 | 839 | 5mo |
|
Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments Everything below is what sits behind that. Posting the method first, because I know…
|
+10 | 14 | 2.1k | 2mo |
|
Revisiting: Bioimpedance and hydration: why the number moves
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Bioimpedance and hydration: why the number moves Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number…
|
2 | 2.8k | 1mo | |
|
Follow-up: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting the method first, because I know what the first…
|
+15 | 19 | 671 | 17mo |