Related substances: compounds chemically related to the target peptide but not the target peptide itself. The standard method separates them and reports them as area percent. How related they can be before they exceed specification is a regulatory question.
Oxidation pathways for methionine and tryptophan posts 61–64
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
I read post #60 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Disulfide formation: if a peptide contains cysteine, it can form disulfide bonds with itself or with other molecules. Under oxidising conditions multiple species appear. Reducing conditions (like DTT) convert them back.
post #62 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Residual solvents: traces of solvents used in purification. These are usually tested by gas chromatography, not by HPLC. A specification for residual solvents should be stated separately from the purity.
Two things before anyone answers the substance.
First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come from
Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come from Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
|
+54 | 59 | 14k | 3mo |
|
Second pass at: Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come from
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Second pass at: Where impurities in solid-phase peptide synthesis come from Everything below is what sits behind that. A documentation question rather than an…
|
+47 | 51 | 3.3k | 5mo |
|
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity
Endotoxin and why it is a separate question from purity Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
2 | 22k | 4mo | |
|
Deamidation and the close-eluting pair it produces
Deamidation and the close-eluting pair it produces Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
+33 | 37 | 46k | 15mo |
|
Revisiting: Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to understand what this number means…
|
+48 | 53 | 918 | 8mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags counter-ion content, data table, HPLC
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
High-resolution MS on aggregates and what it can see — one year on
High-resolution MS on aggregates and what it can see — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like…
|
+54 | 58 | 1.2k | 23mo |
|
Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously
Pre-registering a personal experiment, seriously — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) with SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) and finding the…
|
+96 | 119 | 58k | 14mo |
|
Preservatives: function, testing, and limits
Preservatives: function, testing, and limits — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. tirzepatide has a…
|
+23 | 27 | 3.7k | 16mo |
|
Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Attributing a new peak: degradation product or excipient? Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
|
2 | 15k | 18mo | |
|
Revisiting: Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Aggregates and why a purity assay may miss them entirely Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to understand what this number means…
|
+48 | 53 | 918 | 8mo |